| rfc9920v2.txt | rfc9920.txt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editorial Stream P. Hoffman | Editorial Stream P. Hoffman | |||
| Request for Comments: 9920 ICANN | Request for Comments: 9920 ICANN | |||
| Obsoletes: 9280 A. Rossi | Obsoletes: 9280 A. Rossi | |||
| Updates: 7841, 7991, 7992, 7993, 7994, RFC Series Consulting Editor | Updates: 7841, 7991, 7992, 7993, 7994, RFC Series Consulting Editor | |||
| 7995, 7996, 7997, 8729, 8730, December 2025 | 7995, 7996, 7997, 8729, 8730, February 2026 | |||
| 9720 | 9720 | |||
| Category: Informational | Category: Informational | |||
| ISSN: 2070-1721 | ISSN: 2070-1721 | |||
| RFC Editor Model (Version 3) | RFC Editor Model (Version 3) | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document specifies version 3 of the RFC Editor Model. The model | This document specifies version 3 of the RFC Editor Model. The model | |||
| defines two high-level tasks related to the RFC Series. First, | defines two high-level tasks related to the RFC Series. First, | |||
| skipping to change at line 54 ¶ | skipping to change at line 54 ¶ | |||
| approved by the RFC Series Approval Board. Such documents are not | approved by the RFC Series Approval Board. Such documents are not | |||
| candidates for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC | candidates for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC | |||
| 7841. | 7841. | |||
| Information about the current status of this document, any errata, | Information about the current status of this document, any errata, | |||
| and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at | and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at | |||
| https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9920. | https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9920. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | |||
| to this document. | to this document. | |||
| Table of Contents | Table of Contents | |||
| skipping to change at line 182 ¶ | skipping to change at line 182 ¶ | |||
| 1.1. Changes to RFC 9280 | 1.1. Changes to RFC 9280 | |||
| This section details the changes made to [RFC9280] by the RSWG | This section details the changes made to [RFC9280] by the RSWG | |||
| starting in 2022. If you are not interested in how this document was | starting in 2022. If you are not interested in how this document was | |||
| changed, skip directly to Section 2. | changed, skip directly to Section 2. | |||
| [RFC9280] contained significant changes to the publication model for | [RFC9280] contained significant changes to the publication model for | |||
| RFCs. Those changes created new structures and new processes for the | RFCs. Those changes created new structures and new processes for the | |||
| publication of RFCs. As these structures and processes have been | publication of RFCs. As these structures and processes have been | |||
| exercised, the community has found places where they can might be | exercised, the community has found places where they can be improved. | |||
| improved. In addition, gaps in some of the processes have been | In addition, gaps in some of the processes have been found. This | |||
| found. This document updates [RFC9280] based on these findings. | document updates [RFC9280] based on these findings. | |||
| The organization of this RFC is different from typical RFCs in order | The organization of this RFC is different from typical RFCs in order | |||
| to keep the section numbering the same as [RFC9280]. To keep the | to keep the section numbering the same as [RFC9280]. To keep the | |||
| section numbering the same, the Introduction section is much longer, | section numbering the same, the Introduction section is much longer, | |||
| with several subsections that refer to the main body. | with several subsections that refer to the main body. | |||
| The remainder of this introduction is a list of changes to [RFC9280]. | The remainder of this introduction is a list of changes to [RFC9280]. | |||
| Those changes are instantiated in the rest of the document, with | Those changes are instantiated in the rest of the document, with | |||
| cross-references between the list of changes and the main body. | cross-references between the list of changes and the main body. | |||
| skipping to change at line 300 ¶ | skipping to change at line 300 ¶ | |||
| | If the RPC is responsible for interpreting policy decisions at | | If the RPC is responsible for interpreting policy decisions at | |||
| | both the document and editorial process tooling level, conflicts | | both the document and editorial process tooling level, conflicts | |||
| | on either level will involve interpretation of written policy (or | | on either level will involve interpretation of written policy (or | |||
| | the acknowledgment that policy does not exist to cover a given | | the acknowledgment that policy does not exist to cover a given | |||
| | situation). In any case, the conflict resolution will now use the | | situation). In any case, the conflict resolution will now use the | |||
| | same path of appeal: to the RSAB. | | same path of appeal: to the RSAB. | |||
| 1.2.3. RFC Consumers | 1.2.3. RFC Consumers | |||
| The text in Section 3.3 of this document, concerning RFC consumers, | This text is reflected in Section 3.3 of this document: | |||
| is all new. | ||||
| | The IETF mission statement [RFC3935] is clear that the documents | ||||
| | it produces are intended to be consumed by anyone who wishes to | ||||
| | implement an IETF protocol or operational recommendation: | ||||
| | | ||||
| | to produce high quality, relevant technical and engineering | ||||
| | documents that influence the way people design, use, and manage | ||||
| | the Internet in such a way as to make the Internet work better. | ||||
| | | ||||
| | Section 3.2.1 introduces the term "consumers of RFCs", referring | ||||
| | to them as "constituent stakeholders" who should be considered by | ||||
| | the RSAB when approving Editorial Stream policy documents. | ||||
| | | ||||
| | "Consumers of RFCs" is now defined to mean those people who read | ||||
| | RFCs to understand, implement, critique, and research the | ||||
| | protocols, operational practices, and other content as found in | ||||
| | RFCs. | ||||
| | | ||||
| | The policy to be followed by the RFC publication streams and RFC | ||||
| | Editor in respect to consumers of RFCs is as follows: | ||||
| | | ||||
| | * Consumers of RFCs MUST be considered as separate constituent | ||||
| | stakeholders from IETF/IRTF participants. While IETF/IRTF | ||||
| | participants and others involved in the development and | ||||
| | production of RFCs may be consumers of RFCs, the two are | ||||
| | distinct, overlapping sets. | ||||
| | | ||||
| | * The RFC Editor website (https://www.rfc-editor.org) MUST be | ||||
| | primarily focused on consumers of RFCs. | ||||
| | | ||||
| | * Consumers of RFCs MUST NOT be required or expected to become | ||||
| | IETF/IRTF participants unless they wish to extend, update, or | ||||
| | modify an RFC. | ||||
| 1.3. Updates to RFC 9720 | 1.3. Updates to RFC 9720 | |||
| [RFC9720], "RFC Formats and Versions", updates [RFC9280]. This | [RFC9720], "RFC Formats and Versions", updates [RFC9280]. This | |||
| document updates [RFC9720]. | document updates [RFC9720]. | |||
| 1.3.1. RFCs May Be Reissued | 1.3.1. RFCs May Be Reissued | |||
| Section 7.6 of [RFC9280] says: | Section 7.6 of [RFC9280] says: | |||
| skipping to change at line 331 ¶ | skipping to change at line 363 ¶ | |||
| A new policy is added to Section 7 of this document: | A new policy is added to Section 7 of this document: | |||
| | 7.8. Consistency | | 7.8. Consistency | |||
| | | | | |||
| | RFCs are copyedited, formatted, and then published. They may be | | RFCs are copyedited, formatted, and then published. They may be | |||
| | reissued to maintain a consistent presentation. | | reissued to maintain a consistent presentation. | |||
| 1.4. Purview of the RSWG and RSAB | 1.4. Purview of the RSWG and RSAB | |||
| Section 3 says: | Section 3 of [RFC9280] says: | |||
| | Policies under the purview of the RSWG and RSAB might include, but | | Policies under the purview of the RSWG and RSAB might include, but | |||
| | are not limited to, document formats, processes for publication | | are not limited to, document formats, processes for publication | |||
| | and dissemination of RFCs, and overall management of the RFC | | and dissemination of RFCs, and overall management of the RFC | |||
| | Series. | | Series. | |||
| The following is added to Section 3 of this document immediately | The following is added to Section 3 of this document immediately | |||
| following that sentence: | following that sentence: | |||
| | Such policies will not include detailed technical specifications, | | Such policies will not include detailed technical specifications, | |||
| End of changes. 5 change blocks. | ||||
| 8 lines changed or deleted | 40 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. | ||||